Board and Council Joint Oversight Policies and Procedures

(As approved by the Council of Representatives, April 20, 2026, and adopted by the Board of Directors, April 21, 2026.)

Preamble

All provisions of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Society are hereby incorporated into these Policies and Procedures by reference. In the following text, "Society" shall signify the American Physical Society, "Council" and “Board” signify the Council of Representatives and the Board of Directors of the Society, respectively; "CEO" signifies the Chief Executive Officer of the Society; and “Member” signifies Member of the Society. “Units” signify the Divisions, Topical Groups, Forums, and Sections of the Society.

J1. Amendments to the Constitution and Bylaws

An amendment to the Constitution and Bylaws may be proposed by recommendation to the President:

1. from the Governance Committee;
2. by an affirmative vote of the Council at a regularly scheduled meeting;
3. by petition from at least one percent of the total Membership of the Society;
4. or by the Executive Committees of at least two Units of the Society.

Once a proposed amendment is received by the President, the Governance Committee reviews the amendment and transmits its recommendation to the Board for review and recommendation to the Council for adoption. A majority vote by the Board and the Council is required to adopt the amendment. For these votes, a quorum of two-thirds of the voting members shall apply. Prior to the vote of Council, the recommended revisions shall be made available over a period of 30 days to all Members of the Society for comment.

If the Council does not adopt, the amendment is not enacted. If the amendment is adopted, the complete text of the Constitution and Bylaws including any amendments and the date of its adoption by the Board and Council shall be posted on the APS website within 30 days.

J2. Modifications to the Board, Council, and Joint Oversight Policies and Procedures

A revision to the Policies and Procedures may be proposed by recommendation to the President:

1. from the Governance Committee;
2. by an affirmative vote of the Council and/or the Board at a regularly scheduled meeting;
3. by petition from at least one percent of the total Membership of the Society;
4. or by the Executive Committees of at least two Units of the Society.

Once a proposed revision is received by the President, the Governance Committee reviews the revision and transmits its recommendation to the Board for review and adoption, subject to approval by the Council in the case of the Council or Joint Board and Council Policies and Procedures. A majority vote by the Board and the Council is required to adopt the revision. For these votes, a quorum of two-thirds of the voting members shall apply.

In the case of the Board Policies and Procedures, if the Board does not adopt, the revisions are not enacted. In the case of the Council or Joint Board and Council Policies and Procedures, if the Council does not approve the revision or wishes to make substantive changes, the matter is sent for reconciliation to the Board of Directors Executive Committee and Council Steering Committee acting jointly. If the Board of Directors or the Council does not approve the reconciled version, the revisions are not enacted. If the revisions are adopted, the complete text of the Policies and Procedures including any amendments and the date of its adoption by the Board and Council shall be posted on the APS website within 30 days.

J3. General Guidelines for Letters, Press Releases, and other Communications issued with an APS affiliation

Any public communication by an individual or organization issued with an APS affiliation must be vetted for appropriateness and consistency with the APS mission, values, and other APS communications and statements. This section describes the spokesperson responsibilities among the APS leadership and establishes procedures for less formal APS communications. The following Section J4 describes procedures for APS Public Policy Statements issued either by the Society through POPA, by the Board, or by individual Units.

J3.1 The spokesperson responsibilities within APS are as follows:

APS President

Spokesperson when oral or written testimony is requested by Congress or other governmental body; high-level press statements; lead on media interviews e.g., Nobel Prize(s); statements on Board matters as Board Chair

APS Chief Executive Officer

Spokesperson for matters rising to a major level of importance regarding operational activities or other matters as designated by the President. The point of contact for communications with congressional staff or federal agencies, for day-to-day media inquiries, and for coordinating social media are designated by the CEO.

J3.2 Public statements by a member of APS referencing their APS affiliation must be reviewed and approved by APS leadership (President or CEO) before release.

J3.3 Letters issued by the APS President or Presidential Line are reviewed and approved by the Board Executive Committee before release.

J3.4 Press releases in the area of public affairs are reviewed and approved by the Physics Policy Committee and then reviewed and approved by the Board Executive Committee before release. Press releases from other parts of the APS organization are reviewed and approved by the Board Executive Committee before release.

J3.5 APS committees are advisory, so any policy statements follow the procedures for Public Policy Statements as described in Section J4.

J3.6 Questions about review and approval procedures are addressed directly to the CEO.

J4. Public Policy Statements

The APS recognizes three approval procedures for public policy statements that result in statements designated as (1) Public Policy Statements of the American Physical Society (APS Statements, or APS Public Policy Statements), (2) American Physical Society Board Statements (APS Board Statements), and (3) American Physical Society Unit Statements (APS Unit Statements).

J4.1 Procedure for Issuing APS Public Policy Statements

1. Initiation: Any APS Member, group of Members, or APS Unit may submit a proposal to POPA for a statement. POPA considers those proposals that meet the POPA Guidelines for Submission of APS Statements. If a decision is made not to proceed with drafting a Statement, POPA conveys its decision to those who submitted the proposal.
2. Statement Drafting: POPA has exclusive responsibility for drafting statements. The Chair of POPA has the responsibility for ensuring that the statement draft incorporates appropriate APS member expertise. Members with conflicts of interest should not participate in Statement drafting or approval (see Section J4.4 below). Input to the draft statement is solicited from the Physics Policy Committee.
3. Council Review and Board Approval: Upon POPA approval, the draft is sent to Council for comment. Next, the Board votes on the proposed Statement, taking into consideration comments from Council members. Should the Board not approve the draft, the Board provides POPA with a written list of concerns, and POPA may redraft and resubmit the Statement to the Board. A second disapproval terminates the process. Board approval leads to a Membership review.
4. Membership Review: Upon Board approval, the CEO solicits comments from the entire Membership. Members have a minimum of 30 days to provide comments. At the end of the comment period, all comments are made available to POPA, appropriate APS staff, the Board, and the Council.
5. POPA Review and Revisions: POPA determines whether member comments justify modification or rejection of the draft statement. POPA transmits one of three recommendations to the Board in written form: 1) no redraft is necessary; 2) a POPA-approved redraft is provided; or 3) the statement process should be terminated. POPA, with the help of the Corporate Secretary, provides the Board with a verbal synopsis of member comments and the impact of those comments on the statement.
6. Board Approval: The Board determines if Member comments have been adequately addressed and if the statement is ready for Council approval. Two denials by the Board subsequent to membership review terminate the process. At no time may the Board edit or redraft the statement.
7. Council Approval: POPA presents the verbal synopsis described in J4.5 to the Council. The synopsis and subsequent discussion are reflected in the minutes of the Council meeting. If the Council approves the statement, it is deemed ready for publication.
8. POPA Review: If the Council does not approve the statement, it is sent back to POPA with a written list of concerns. POPA may edit the draft and return it to the Board and the Council or terminate the statement process. A second denial by the Council normally terminates the process. At no time may Council edit or redraft the statement.
9. Publication: Under the direction of the CEO, the Society publishes and distributes approved statements, at a minimum informing APS Unit officers and announcing the statement in the APS News and/or the APS website.
10. Archiving: Statements of the American Physical Society are subject to review on the fifth anniversary of issuance or renewal, or earlier at the discretion of POPA or the Council. POPA provides a recommendation to the Council, and the Council votes to either renew or archive the Statement.

J4.2 Procedure for Issuing APS Board Statements

The Board, or the Executive Committee of the Board, may determine that time is of the essence, and it is in the interest of the Society to issue a public policy statement in an expedited manner to be designated as an APS Board Statement.

1. Initiation: If a proposal for a Board Statement does not originate within the Board or the Executive Committee of the Board, the Executive Committee of the Board reviews the proposal for appropriateness before moving forward.
2. Drafting: The Board or Executive Committee of the Board, with the assistance of the POPA Steering Committee, drafts the statement.
3. POPA Review: The POPA Steering Committee shall review the draft statement and solicit comments from the PPC, Council Steering Committee and the APS Office of Public Affairs. The POPA Steering Committee may edit the draft before forwarding it to the Board for final approval.
4. Board Approval: The Board reviews the draft statement and any comments from the PPC and Office of Public Affairs. Additional edits to the draft require POPA Steering Committee approval. Upon final Board approval, the APS Board Statement is distributed under the supervision of the CEO and passed to POPA to determine if procedures should be initiated to turn the statement into an APS Public Policy Statement.
5. Publication: Under the direction of the CEO, the Society publishes and distributes approved statements, at a minimum informing APS Unit officers and announcing the statement in the APS News and/or the APS website.
6. Sunset: APS Board Statements will be archived after one year and are not renewable. An APS Board Statement may become an APS Public Policy Statement if the procedure described in Section J4.1 is subsequently followed.

J4.3 APS Criteria and Procedures for Issuing Unit Statements

The following criteria and procedure are to be used by Units issuing their own policy statements (Unit Statements). Units, with the assistance of the APS Office of Public Affairs, must take into consideration the impact of the statement on the Society and the physics community and evaluate whether it is within the area of expertise of the Unit’s members. Unit Statements must not conflict with statements of other Units or of the APS as a whole. Unit Statements must clearly denote that the statement does not necessarily represent the position of the APS as a whole.

1. Criteria for Proposed Statements – The following criteria are used to determine the appropriateness of a proposed Unit Statement and serve as a proposal template.
   1. Relevance: Why should the Unit make this statement and how is it specifically relevant to the interest and expertise of the Unit Members?
   2. Urgency: Why does the statement need to be issued now?
   3. Background: What technical background is there to support the statement?
   4. Context: Who are the potential proponents and critics of the statement and what have been/are the actions of other scientific organizations?
   5. Breadth: Is this a statement that would be better issued as an APS statement?
   6. Publication: What should the Unit do with the statement?
   7. Endurance: Will the statement have enduring value or is it a temporary position on an issue of specificity?
2. Procedure – The Unit Executive Committee has overall responsibility for reviewing and deciding whether or not to issue a proposed Unit Statement. The Unit Executive Committee is also responsible for statement publication and periodic review to ensure continued relevance once it has been published.
   1. Acceptance: A statement proposal may be submitted by any current Unit Member. The proposal should not be more than three pages in length and address the criteria for proposed statements. A positive vote by a two-thirds majority of the Executive Committee is required for a proposed statement to move forward.
   2. Drafting: Upon approval to move forward, the Chair appoints a subcommittee to draft a statement and ensures that the subcommittee incorporates members with sufficient expertise. At least two members of the Executive Committee are appointed to the drafting subcommittee. A positive vote of the Executive Committee is required to accept a draft statement.
   3. Preliminary Review: Upon acceptance, the draft statement is forwarded to the Corporate Secretary who coordinates distribution to the Physics Policy Committee and the POPA Steering Committee for preliminary comment and review. These reviews focus on appropriateness and conflict with other Unit or APS Statements. A report of these reviews is returned to the Unit Executive Committee for possible revisions before moving to obtain Unit member comments.
   4. Member Input: The Executive Committee actively solicits comments from the Unit Membership with the assistance of the APS Staff as necessary. Unit Members have a minimum of 30 days to provide input.
   5. Modifications: At the end of the comment period, all comments are reviewed by the drafting committee. The drafting committee determines if the comments justify modifications to the draft statement. All comments and modifications to the statement are forwarded to the Unit Executive Committee for final review.
   6. Approval: Final Unit approval of the draft statement requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Unit Executive Committee.
3. Board Approval: Upon final Unit approval, the proposal, the Unit approved statement, summaries of Unit Member comments, and a plan for publicizing the Unit Statement are forwarded to the Corporate Secretary. Prior to consideration by the Board, the Corporate Secretary solicits recommendations from the Physics Policy Committee, the Office of Public Affairs, and the POPA Steering Committee. Approval by the Board is required before publication of any Unit Statement.
4. Archiving: Unit Statements are subject to review on the fifth anniversary of issuance or renewal, or earlier, at the discretion of the Unit Executive Committee. The Unit Executive Committee votes to either renew or archive the Statement.

J4.4 Conflict of Interest: Conflict of interest is defined as "any financial or other interest which conflicts with the service of the individual because it (1) could significantly impair the individual's objectivity or (2) could create an unfair competitive advantage for any person or organization." [Ref: National Academies of Science, Policy on Committee Composition and Balance and Conflict of Interest for Committees, used in the Development of Reports (May 12, 2003).] Anyone, particularly POPA, Board, and Council members, who has a conflict of interest, must recuse themselves from all aspects of the Statement process, including drafting, commentary, and voting. The President of the APS is the final arbiter of potential conflicts of interest.