The purpose of this game is to help you learn some of the fundamental terms in quantum computing. Quantum computers are a new kind of computer that may be able to do things that are currently impossible with even the most powerful “regular” supercomputer. To do this they use quantum mechanics, the science of how things work when they are very small. Quantum mechanics shows up in movies and TV all the time but often is presented in misleading ways. This game will teach you about two quantum mechanical ideas: superposition and entanglement.
While regular computers use bits — 0’s or 1’s stored in the computer, quantum computers use qubits. Qubits have a special ability — they can be in a superposition. A superposition is a combination of two different states at the same time. This can happen in quantum mechanics. In a real quantum computer, this might be done with electrons or atoms acting as qubits. We will explore an analogy and use a spinning coin to represent a qubit. The spinning coin has red R (which could represent 1) on one side and yellow Y (which could represent 0) on the other. When it’s spinning, notice that the coin is not R or Y, but both; this is like a qubit in superposition. However, if you “measure” the coin by slapping it on the table, it will no longer be in a superposition, but will be either R or Y. Notice also that a coin doesn’t spin forever, but will stop on its own. This is like how a real qubit behaves. Real qubits can be in a superposition of states, but when they are measured they can only be in one state at a time. Real qubits also tend to “fall over” because the superposition breaks down.
The other important idea in this activity is called entanglement, which is a connection that can exist between two qubits. This connection can come from a physical interaction like a collision, or from two particles getting created from the same source. Entanglement can be explained with math, but we can also see its consequences. If qubits are entangled, measuring one will impact the state of the other one. This is very strange. In our coin analogy (but now with two “entangled” coins) this would mean that if you slapped one coin and got R, the 2nd coin would match, and also be R (for one kind of entanglement). A non-entangled state would not have this matching behavior; if you measure one coin in a non-entangled pair it would have no impact on the second. They would be independent and both would be random.
You will observe both of these ideas in the game Tangle.